<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rainbow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://desiknitter.com/2009/07/rainbow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://desiknitter.com/2009/07/rainbow/</link>
	<description>An academic juggles knitting, sewing, and other crafts in Kolkata</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 23:58:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: desiknitter</title>
		<link>http://desiknitter.com/2009/07/rainbow/comment-page-1/#comment-1996</link>
		<dc:creator>desiknitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desiknitter.com/archives/politics/rainbow#comment-1996</guid>
		<description>MICHELLE - just to clarify, it&#039;s only *homosexuality* between consenting adults that has been *decriminalised* - according to an old Victorian law, any kind of non-vaginal sex, including that between consenting same-sex couples, was punishable by imprisonment. Section 377 also covers pedophilia and non-consensual, non-vaginal sex, but was also used to harass gay couples. The major victory has been to *legally* remove consensual non-heterosexual, and non-vaginal sex from its ambit. The legal right to marriage, or civil unions for same-sex couples, or social acceptance for such couples and unions are still a far cry... As MEL points out, it&#039;s a small, but very significant first step.       

ROBIN and MEERA, welcome to the blog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MICHELLE &#8211; just to clarify, it&#8217;s only *homosexuality* between consenting adults that has been *decriminalised* &#8211; according to an old Victorian law, any kind of non-vaginal sex, including that between consenting same-sex couples, was punishable by imprisonment. Section 377 also covers pedophilia and non-consensual, non-vaginal sex, but was also used to harass gay couples. The major victory has been to *legally* remove consensual non-heterosexual, and non-vaginal sex from its ambit. The legal right to marriage, or civil unions for same-sex couples, or social acceptance for such couples and unions are still a far cry&#8230; As MEL points out, it&#8217;s a small, but very significant first step.       </p>
<p>ROBIN and MEERA, welcome to the blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://desiknitter.com/2009/07/rainbow/comment-page-1/#comment-1995</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desiknitter.com/archives/politics/rainbow#comment-1995</guid>
		<description>Thank you for such an interesting blog.  I loved reading your words today.  It gives me hope that the world is gradually getting to be less focused on hating others who are different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for such an interesting blog.  I loved reading your words today.  It gives me hope that the world is gradually getting to be less focused on hating others who are different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://desiknitter.com/2009/07/rainbow/comment-page-1/#comment-1994</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desiknitter.com/archives/politics/rainbow#comment-1994</guid>
		<description>I hope California is next.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope California is next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mel</title>
		<link>http://desiknitter.com/2009/07/rainbow/comment-page-1/#comment-1991</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desiknitter.com/archives/politics/rainbow#comment-1991</guid>
		<description>My understanding is that this ruling only applies to the Capital Territory at the moment, though, and that it will require some broader action to extend it to the nation at large. Still, it&#039;s quite a landmark case and a very long time in coming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My understanding is that this ruling only applies to the Capital Territory at the moment, though, and that it will require some broader action to extend it to the nation at large. Still, it&#8217;s quite a landmark case and a very long time in coming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meera</title>
		<link>http://desiknitter.com/2009/07/rainbow/comment-page-1/#comment-1990</link>
		<dc:creator>meera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desiknitter.com/archives/politics/rainbow#comment-1990</guid>
		<description>well said. the whole idea of decriminalising homosexuality is not to propagate it or say that it would destroy indian culture. the idea is that two consenting adults can have a consensual relationship in private without fear or interference from the state similar to couples in heterosexual relationships. so it is about equal rights and a recognition that every one is different.

btw, have enjoyed your blog for ages especially the patterns
meera</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well said. the whole idea of decriminalising homosexuality is not to propagate it or say that it would destroy indian culture. the idea is that two consenting adults can have a consensual relationship in private without fear or interference from the state similar to couples in heterosexual relationships. so it is about equal rights and a recognition that every one is different.</p>
<p>btw, have enjoyed your blog for ages especially the patterns<br />
meera</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

