FO: Arch-Shaped Socks
In the hustle and bustle of Stitches West, I almost forgot to post about my Arch-Shaped socks, which I finished a week or so ago.
Possibly the longest I have taken for a pair of socks without any cables or lace. Also a project that involved more frogging than most – as I complained, the mix of distraction and odd wording in the pattern made for lots of confusion, and then the more I tried to get things right, the more they went wrong. But, at any rate, here they are.
I like them a lot – they hug the feet very well, and the rib on the soles also gives a very pleasant, nubby feel on the soles. These are not socks to wear on a long hike, but on a short walk they feel very good. I had been a bit worried about that, but thankfully the ribbing is not annoying.
Project Notes:
Pattern: Arch-Shaped Socks, (.pdf link, free!) by Meangirl
Yarn: Koigu KPM Solid, in Rust/1110, dye lot 152, just under 2 skeins
Needles: Takumi bamboo, size 0 DPNs (I also broke 3 needles in the course of this project, so you can imagine how much it stressed me out!)
Modifications: The pattern as written calls for a stockinette arch, but I followed a few others and continued the k3, p2 rib throughout. This is why I needed to pay attention to the increases along the stem of the sole, making sure the m1s were m1k and m1p according to the pattern.
The main thing is keeping track of these decreases and increases. This is not something I should have so much difficulty with, really, but I knit the pair almost exclusively while watching back-to-back episodes of Jeremy Brett’s Sherlock Holmes episodes (Netflix Instant Watch zindabad!), and it was often a few rows before I realized I had forgotten one increase or decrease and had to frog back. Also, m1 on a purl is extremely fiddly when you have to twist the yarn picked up between two stitches, twist it and purl through the back loop.
But this arch shaping style does offer a lot of design possibilities. If I make them again, I would cast on fewer stitches, like my usual 60. I followed the given number – 65 – because I wasn’t sure if modifying the stitch count would mess with the pattern later on, and now I know it doesn’t. (Note to self: reading a pattern through before starting is not such a bad idea!) 65 made it a little loose on the cuff and ankles for me; it was only much later that my maths-challenged brain realised that I could have cast on 60 and still stuck with the ribbing pattern. It would have just reduced one multiple. Duh.
Ah well. Warm, well-fitting, comfy socks. Do I really care that the decreases at the top centre are not the tidiest? Trust me, I tried, many times, to get them to be neater, but somehow, they look a bit ragged. Again, that’s not the pattern fault, I should have planned ahead to make one of the k3 bands flow smoothly from cuff to toe in the very centre, and worked out a neater formula for the arch-ribbing to flow into the toe. By the time I got to the toes I was so done with the frogging that I did it a bit half-heartedly. Anyway. Next time!
















































